A Strong Dictatorship is Better than a Weak Democracy free essay sample

This house would rather have a strong dictatorship than a weak democracy Pros of having a dictatorship include: No elections, imagine not having to deal with all the political rhetoric, you already have your leader for life. Difference in opinions is ubiquitous and inevitable, and arises on every topic. For every opinion one man may have, there will always be another man opposing him (look at this debate, for example) and this may not always end well, maybe even resulting in potential Civil Wars. With a dictator, you have one ruler, one voice, a united voice. he  economy  could be more controlled and sustained by a  dictatorship, as the economy would be run by the state. Though a small minority of the population suffers from violence from the dictator, the vast majority of the population will exist in a nearly crime free society in large part because the smallest infraction of the law (or even the the perceived infraction) is dealt with severe punishments. The  Soviet Union  had very little street crime, and the Russian mafia was never grew to the size of the Italian-American mafia, or the plethora of other American criminal organizations because of the brutality of the Soviet regime. Saddam Husseins regime provided free health care, access to affordable higher education, enviable for the region transportation systems, and other benefits. The Chinese government provides has better roads, railways, airports, ports, manufacturing facilities, than neighboring democratic India. The dictatorial nature of theChinese government  and unquestioned decisions has benefits of massive infrastructure improvements. The Chinese building several hydro-electric dams, and moved several million people, which wouldnt have been able accomplished in a country with personal rights to property, or the power to self determine their own existence. Taxes are usually low, because income is not an issue. Free-market-oriented economists since  Milton Friedman  have strongly criticized the efficiency of democracy. They base this on the argument that voters are irrational, among other things. Their criticism towards democracy is that voters are highly uninformed about many political issues, especially relating to economics, and have a strong bias about the few issues on which they are fairly knowledgeable. The masses are not adequately educated to be able to foresee the betterment of the community they belong to, and therefore are unable to cast a vote to that effect. But given the right to vote, an uneducated man would certainly cast a vote which will more likely be wrong as effected by the personality charisma of the candidate or some other superficial reasons. An ordinary voter may also be lured into casting a vote on the basis of financial help or some other petty promises. Chicago economist Donald Wittman has written numerous works attempting to counter these common views of his colleagues. He argues democracy is efficient based on the premise of rational voters, competitive elections, and relatively low political transactions costs. Economist Bryan Caplan argues, while Wittman makes strong arguments for the latter two points, he cannot overcome the insurmountable evidence in favor of voter irrationality. It still remains the Achilles heel of democratic government. The problem is not mere lack of information; it is that voters badly interpret and judge the information they do have. Unfortunately, according to Caplan, the problem lies in the fact that the relative cost of learning about a particular issue is very high compared to the cost of not knowing that information. This really becomes an issue when those ignorant people vote, which they will do because of the good feeling it gives them. [1]  Other economists, such as Meltzer and Richard, have added that as industrial activity in a democracy increases, so too do the peoples demands for welfare. However, because of the  median voter theorem, only a few people actually make the decisions in the country, and many may be unhappy with those decisions. In this way, they argue, democracies are inefficient. This could result in a wealth disparity in such a country, or even racial discrimination. Fierlbeck (1998) points out that such a result is not necessarily due to a failing in the democratic process, but rather, because democracy is too responsive to the desires of a large middle class increasingly willing to disregard the muted voices of economically marginalized groups within its own borders. [3]The criticism remains that the will of the democratic majority may not always be in the best interest of all citizens within the country or beneficial to the future of the country itself. Furthermore, some have argued that voters may not be educated enough to exercise their democratic right. A population with low intellect may not be capable of making beneficial decisions. They argue that the lack of rationality or even education is being taken advantage of by politicians, that compete more in the way of  public relations  and tactics, than in ideology. One such argument is that the benefits of a specialised society may be compromised by democracy. As ordinary citizens are encouraged to take part in the political life of the country, they have the power to directly influence the outcome of government policies through the democratic procedures of voting, campaigning and the use of press. The result is that government policies may be more influenced by non-specialist opinions and thereby the effectiveness compromised, especially if a policy is very technically sophisticated and/or the general public inadequately informed. For example, there is no guarantee that those who campaign about the governments economic policies are themselves professional economists or academically competent in this particular discipline, regardless of whether they were well-educated. Essentially this means that a democratic government may not be providing the most good for the most amount of people. Additionally, some political scientists question the notion that democracy is an uncontested good. [7]  If we base our critique on the definition of democracy as governance based on the will of the majority, there can be some foreseeable consequences to this form of rule. For example, Fierlbeck (1998: 12) points out that the middle class majority in a country may decide to redistribute wealth and resources into the hands of those that they feel are most capable of investing or increasing them. Machiavelli  put forth the idea that democracies will tend to cater to the whims of the people, who then follow false ideas to entertain themselves, squander their reserves, and do not deal with potential threats to their rule until it is too late to oppose them. He put forth a cyclical theory of government where monarchies always decay into aristocracies, that then decay into democracies, which decay into anarchy, then tyranny, then monarchy. An Example is the timeline of France before, during, and after the French Revolution until the last Bourbon Monarch. More recently, democracy is criticised for not offering enough political stability. As governments are frequently elected on and off, there tend to be frequent changes in the policies of democratic countries both domestically and internationally. Even if a political party maintains power, vociferous, headline grabbing protests and harsh criticism from the mass media are often enough to force sudden, unexpected political change. Frequent policy changes with regard to business and immigration are likely to deter investment and so hinder economic growth. For this reason, many people have put forward the idea that democracy is undesirable for a developing country in which economic growth and the reduction of poverty are top priority. [9]  However, Downs argued that the political market works much the same way as the economic market, and that there could potentially be an equilibrium in the system because of democratic process. However, he eventually argued that imperfect knowledge in politicians and voters prevented the reaching of that equilibrium. The  constitutions  of many countries have parts of them that restrict the nature of the types of laws that  legislatures  can pass. A fundamental idea behind some of these restrictions, is that the majority of a population and its elected legislature can often be the source of minority persecutions, such as with  racial discrimination. Some countries throughout the world have judiciaries where judges can serve for long periods of time, and often serve under appointed posts. This is often balanced, however, by the fact that some trials are decided by  juries. While many, like Wittman, have argued that democracies work much the same way as the free market and that there is competition among parties to prevent oppression by the majority, others have argued that there is actually very little competition among political parties in democracies due to the high cost associated with campaigning. Some  Right-Libertarians  criticize democracy because they claim it is impractical or immoral. [13]  The criticism for impracticality is essentially that in order to be logically consistent people would need to vote on all action, and that this would lead to the extermination of the human species. Others criticize democracy for being immoral on the grounds that it coercively involves people, i. e. it violates  voluntarism Some thinkers believe democracy will result in the peoples distrust and disrespect of governments or religious sanctity. The distrust and disrespect pervades to all parts of society whenever and wherever there is  seniority  and juniority, for example between a  parent  and a  child, a  teacher  and a  student. This in turn is suggested to be the cause of frequent  divorces,  teenage crimes,vandalism,  hooliganism  and low education attainment in Western societies, all of which are lower in Asian societies. Even a democracy can become corrupt. This is a simple form of appealing to the short term interests of the voters. This tactic has been known to be heavily used in north and north-east region of  Thailand. Another form is commonly called  Pork barrel  where local areas or political sectors are given special benefits but whose costs are spread among all  taxpayers. Mere elections are just one aspect of the democratic process. Other tenets of democracy, like relative equality and freedom, are frequently absent in ostensibly democratic countries. Moreover, in many countries, democratic participation is less than 50% at times, and it can be argued that election of individual(s) instead of ideas disrupts democracy. Rebuttals: If people say that a â€Å"nearly crime free society in large part because the smallest infraction of the law (or even the the perceived infraction) is dealt with severe punishments† implies that the dictatorship is ruled by fear and people live in fear, oppose it by pointing out that Chinese philosopher Han Fao believed in strict punishment to rule, believing that it is key to a good society. Are we to contradict the teachings of an Ancient Chinese thinker whose words have inspired for so many thousands of years? And it’s not like this punishment is for the innocent, or done in spite. It is done to teach a lesson, one hard to learn. Wrongdoers cannot go unpunished. If people say that with democracy people find freedom, point out that freedom and democracy are different. In words attributed to Scottish historian Alexander Tytler: A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until a majority of voters discover that they can vote themselves largess out of the public treasury. Democracy evolves into kleptocracy. A majority bullying a minority is just as bad as a dictator, communist or otherwise, doing so. Democracy is two coyotes and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. † There is a difference between democracy and freedom. Freedom is not measured by the ability to vote. It is measured by the breadth of those things on which we do not vote. If people say to look at dictators like Stalin or Hitler, say that we are discussing good, strong dictatorships, like that of Napoleon. He built roads and hospitals, helped repay France’s loans, established city sanitation projects and beautification projects, made new, fair laws, made a Central bank for the good of the people, commissioned many beautiful artworks, as well as insisted on freedom. So no, freedom is not limited to democracy. If people say that Dictatorships are situations where your entire life depends on the opinion and oppression of one man, say that a strong dictatorship has advisers that advise the dictator on what the people want and what the people hate. A dictator with a wicked mind like Stalin was not a strong dictator. Strong dictators are not defined by how many people they kill. A strong dictator is defined by how well he can control the country, economy, world status, etc. Also a strong dictator looks after his people because the people are his country and with no people there will not be a country. If people say that people prefer to have democracies where they can make decisions, say that it wasn’t just leaders who were driving these changes. In one study by the Program on International Policy Attitudes, only  16 percent of Russians  said it was â€Å"very important† that their nation be governed democratically. The regular Afrobarometer survey of the African continent has found declining levels of support for democracy in many key countries. And in Guatemala, Paraguay, Colombia, Peru, Honduras, and Nicaragua, either a minority or only a small majority of people think democracy is preferable to any other type of government. Even in East Asia, one of the most democratic regions of the world, polls show rising dissatisfaction with democracy. In fact, several countries in the region have developed what Yu-tzung Chang, Yunhan Zhu, and Chong-min Park, who studied data from the regular Asian Barometer surveys, have termed â€Å"authoritarian nostalgia. If they say that democracy cannot achieve much or help, mention that India still continues to be plagued by the same old problems of poverty, economic inequality, illiteracy, population, widespread corruption and so on. It is perhaps the time of an able, strong-minded, powerful dictator to take hold of the country and cleanse the entire system A benevolent visionary, who can lead by example and get the things done with speed and perfection. Terms *A Job Safety Analysis: one of the risk assessment tools used to identify and control workplace hazards. A JSA is a second tier risk assessment with the aim of preventing personal injury to a person, or their colleagues ** Referendum: a general vote by the electorate on a single political question which has been referred to them for a direct decision. *** Voluntarism: the word  voluntary action  means action based on  free will, which in turn means action which is performed free from certain  constraints. The constraint of (government)  coercion  is often considered in this context, where it remains the question what constitutes coercion. Not all dictatorships are composed of men whose first priorities are their own power. I would like to make a well-known example of the famous dictator Napoleon. His reign brought France out of dark times, and although people could argue that his priority was to conquer the world, we cannot deny that he did many good things for France, from building banks to commissioning art to making fair laws. The people were always a priority of his. Then Id like to make a more recent example of Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew who is arguably a dictator. His views on education have done wonders for the country, and his ideas for bonds guarantee many, many Singaporeans access to great education such as that found in Harvard, Yale, Princeton, etc. These types of good dictators still exist. Second, democracies may not always be what they seem. In Ecuador, elected President Rafael Correa, who has displayed a strong authoritarian streak, recently won legislation that would grant him expansive new powers. And, in Russia, Vladimir Putin used the power he won in elections to essentially dismantle the country’s democracy. In terms of economic sense, we can look at US, the land of liberty. In 2013, their budget deficit has reached 600 billion. In 2009, it is 1. 4 trillion. With such a high budget deficit, it has caused economic recession not only to itself but to countries closely related to them. This is mainly due to democracy since politicians are unwilling to increase the tax rate since they might lose votes to opposition parties. As such, tax revnue is lesser than government expenditure, resulting in an increasing budget deficit. When we cross refer to China, we can see that the case is totally different. With no opposition party and no democracy, Chinese government is able to make effective decisions on tax rates and economic policies; hence we can see the rise of China as a power house, which is expected to overtake America in 2015. A strong dictatorship can protect its people and offer them comfort in their life. Another way strong dictatorship is better than a weak democracy is people under strong dictatorship don’t have to worry about rising prices. Under strong dictatorships people also don’t have to worry about having health insurance because the government looks after them. In the history of this world you can see that a strong dictatorship leads countries to strong nations. For example under communism Russia went up to a status of a world power. Also during communism people had comfort in their lives and even the lower class had money to live, buy food, and even own a car. In Russia minimum wage got you a house, food, and even a car. With a strong dictatorship you can have world security, and international relations. A strong dictatorship can provide security for a lot of people. Last but not least it would be the problem of the efficiency. Democracy is never as efficient as dictatorship. Think about it in this way, if many people all have the right to vote on what they want it would never be as efficient as a single ruler deciding on the countrys behalf. With a capable leader, strong dictatorship has an advantage over weak democracy in a sense that the dictator can make decisions efficiently. Whereas in the case of weak democracy while different opposition parties and ruling parties have different opinions on certain policies, resulting in a scenario where a decision is unable to be made, resulting to a loss of many possible opportunities. Difference in opinions is ubiquitous and inevitable, and arises on every topic. For every opinion one man may have, there will always be another man opposing him (look at this debate, for example) and this may not always end well, maybe even resulting in potential Civil Wars. With a dictator, you have one ruler, one voice, a united voice. The economy  could be more controlled and sustained by a  dictatorship, as the economy would be run by the state. Dictatorships usually involve better law enforcement, so the vast majority of the population will exist in a nearly crime free society in large part because the smallest infraction of the law (or even the the perceived infraction) is dealt with severe punishments. The  Soviet Union  had very little street crime, and the Russian mafia was never grew to the size of the Italian-American mafia, or the plethora of other American criminal organizations because of the brutality of the Soviet regime. Saddam Husseins regime provided free health care, access to affordable higher education, enviable for the region transportation systems, and other benefits. The Chinese government provides has better roads, railways, airports, ports, manufacturing facilities, than neighboring democratic India. More recently, democracy is also criticised for not offering enough political stability. As governments are frequently elected on and off, there tend to be frequent changes in the policies of democratic countries both domestically and internationally. Another problem is that the people who vote in democracies may not always have a clear perspective of the figures or policies of the issues theyre voting on. For example, the United Kingdom public thinks that 31% of the population is immigrants, when the official figures are 13%. 29% of people living in UK think they spend more on JSA (Job Safety Analysis) than pensions, when in fact they spend ? Furthermore, some have argued that voters may not be educated enough to exercise their democratic right. A population with low intellect may not be capable of making beneficial decisions. They argue that the lack of rationality or even education is being taken advantage of by politicians that compete more in the way of  public relations  and tactics, rather than in ideology. One of the best ways to measure the impact of the government system a state implements is comparing it as opposed to similar states who took different choices. One of this comparisons can be made between is between India and China, both countries are comparable in the time they have been a state, since India gained its independence in 1947 and the Peoples Republic of China was proclaimed in 1949, and also in that they are populous, by 1951 India had a population of 361,090,000 and China had a population of 563,000,000. However, while India chose democracy, China chose a dictatorship of some sorts. If we look at both countries today, we see that China is doing great economically, whereas in India, the economy isnt. All in all, it is evident that dictatorship is not necessarily evil, corrupt.

Multi-Core Processors or Multi-Core Cpus

Question: Discuss about the Multi-Core Processors or Multi-Core Cpus ? Answer: Evaluation of Processors Multi-Core Processors Or Multi-Core Cpus are presently considered as the standard for the present era of computing. As the multi-core processors currently available in the market utilize a variety of architecture and claim to deliver several levels of performance, it has become essential to test them against certain benchmarks in order to make sure that performances of these processors are aligned with the specification being expected (Cpubenchmark.net, 2016). In this paper, a discussion has been provided on the benchmark standards that are currently being used by the industry to analysis the performance of multi-core central processing units. The discussed benchmarks have then been utilized to compare the performance of two INTEL-made processors, namely the Nehalem-EP and the Westmere-EP, that are currently being used in the CERN facility (Intel.com, 2016). In general, multi-core processors currently being used at the CERN facility have been designed for supporting a wide range of applications, like that of the virtualization, embedded systems and so on and so forth (Cse.wustl.edu, 2016). Thus, the benchmarks used for testing such processors emphasize on the concept of concurrency while utilizing the perspective of parallelism: the measure being represented in terms of throughput of workload and data. The following benchmark is generally used for such purpose: SPEC CPU 2006: This benchmark has been designed for providing such performance measurements which can be utilized while comparing the computing workload of different computing devices (Spec.org, 2016). The SPEC CPU 2006 actually consists of two benchmark suits: the CINT 2006 and the CFP 2006.The CINT 2006 is utilized for measuring the performance of computing devices based on their capability of conducting computation of integers (Spec.org, 2016). On the other hand, the CFP 2006 is utilized for measuring the performance of floating point calculations. Intel utilizes a variant of SPEC2006, formally known as the HEPSPEC06 for the benchmarking purpose (Intel.com, 2016). The application of the above mentioned benchmark on the said processor yields the following results: Figure 1: HEPSPEC06 performance comparison between the Westmere-Ep and the Nehalem-EP (Source: Cds.cern.ch, 2016) As shown in the graph above, the two systems, while running at the same frequency, provide the performance while utilizing up to 8 CPUs. This is because both the processors have the physical core essential for running the test workload (Cds.cern.ch, 2016). The SMT (Surface Mount Technology) advantages of the said processors have also been compared, then results of which have been provided in the following section. The measurements that have been utilized for the purpose of comparison are: 1. SMT-off: Measuring the standard power without the SMT. The HEPSPEC06 measurements have been taken for 12 CPUs. 2. SMT-on: The standard power has been measured with the SMT. Besides this, the HEPSPEC06 measurements have been taken for 24 CPUs. It has been observed by the researchers of the CERN facility that the efficiency of the Westmere-Ep is almost 10 % more efficient than that of the Nehalem-EP (Intel.com, 2016). The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) experiments being conducted at the CERN facility require highend applications for the purpose of data analysis. In order to compare the efficiency of the said processor, the expert team conducting this particular research, made one such application, run on both of the processors (Cds.cern.ch, 2016). The execution time for the computational work, as observed during the experiment, has been demonstrated below: Figure 2: Comparison between the execution time of the Westmere-Ep and the Nehalem-EP (Source: Cds.cern.ch, 2016) Thus, it is evident from the discussions made in the report that the Westmere-Ep is more efficient than that of the Nehalem-EP. References Cds.cern.ch,. (2016). Retrieved 2 January 2016, from https://cds.cern.ch/record/1325107/files/02-Evaluation%20of%20the%20Intel%20Westmere-EP%20server%20processor%20final.pdf Cpubenchmark.net,. (2016). PassMark Software - CPU Benchmark Charts. Cpubenchmark.net. Retrieved 2 January 2016, from https://www.cpubenchmark.net/ Cse.wustl.edu, D. (2016). Multicore Processor Performance Analysis - A Survey. Cse.wustl.edu. Retrieved 2 January 2016, from https://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse567-13/ftp/multicore/ Intel.com,. (2016). Retrieved 2 January 2016, from https://www.intel.com/Assets/en_US/PDF/prodbrief/xeon-5300.pdf Intel.com,. (2016). Retrieved 2 January 2016, from https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/high-performance-computing/high-performance-computing-xeon-e5-cern-higgs-boson-study.html Spec.org,. (2016). SPEC Benchmarks. Spec.org. Retrieved 2 January 2016, from https://www.spec.org/benchmarks.html

How Weve Prepared Our Themes Plugins for the New Block Editor in WordPress 5.0

Here at ThemeIsle, we started building themes and plugins six years ago. To be more exact, ThemeIsles first theme was published in the WordPress repo in July 2013. Back then, we were on WordPress 3.6 and people were doing the Harlem Shake. A lot of changes have happened in WordPress (and music) since then, and weve gotten better at making themes and plugins.Changes happening with the WordPress CMS are influencing our users, our products, and our business. And the recent release of WordPress 5.0 was no different.The new block editor pushed us to reconsider our product portfolio and come up with a plan to integrate the new block editor (AKA Gutenberg) into  our themes and plugins.While the block editor was undergoing testing, we watched the community talking about it, bashing the initiative and the adversity it created. But as the release rolled out, developers found that most end-users were quite content with it.At the time that were publishing this post, over 30% of users have upda ted their sites to 5.0, which is a considerable amount even if some of them are still using the old editor.So heres what we did to prepare a smooth transition to the new editor and a few considerations for users who are faced with the challenge of whether or not to use the block editor. Neve has integrated the Gutenberg editor seamlessly into the backend. Now your edits will look almost identical to the frontend.Weve also looked at what we can offer within the blocks and how we can bring more of each themes flavor into the blocks styling. Weve made sure that all typography, color, and layout options (including both those  from the theme or from the new editor)  make for a smooth transition between the backend and frontend, alongside default and custom blocks that beautifully match the themes styles.Weve made it our primary mission to make sure they have the best user experience possible. This is why, with the WordPress 5 in place, weve focused on paying special attention to the new editor and ways of integrating it in the themes.Rodica Andronache, Theme Lead at ThemeIsleNew block templates for Hestia and Neve, powered by OtterBoth Neve and Hestia recommend our new free plugin called Otter. Gutenberg Blocks and Template Library by Otter Author(s): ThemeIsleCurrent Version: 1.2.5Last Updated: September 10, 2019otter-blocks.zip 96%Ratings 113,328Downloads WP 5.0+Requires With Otter, were exploring new uses for blocks and templates (like pricing plans, features, team member showcases, and more) that speed up post creation.While you can use Otter with any WordPress theme (as long as youre using the new block editor),  weve added some special goodies for Neve and Hestia users.If you have one of our Hestia or Neve themes installed, you will be greeted with a surprise Otter offers pre-defined block configurations that nicely match the themes looks.Styled Hestia templates in Otters section blockBlock editor compatibility for our plugins, tooFor plugins, we needed to decide which of the Gutenberg APIs was better suited for the integration. That is, where would users find the plugins options and how would those options be integrated into the editor?For Feedzy RSS Feeds, we introduced a block that replaced the older shortcode method:New blocks created for Feedzy RSS Feeds and Section block (in Otter)In the case of WP Product review  , we decided to use the Plugin API and integrate the WP Product Review options into the sidebar:For Visualizer: Tables and Charts, the block was a portal to display/edit the existing shortcodes, which were saved as a custom post type.Backward compatibility was our main focus so we tried experimenting many ways to make sure we give the seamless experience as before while making sure our products are just as much Gutenberg ready in terms of code, as theyre in their design philosophy.Hardeep Asrani, Product Manager at ThemeIsleAre you ready for the block editor?Going back to the editor adoption by users now and what is the best course of action at this time, I see two scenarios depending on what type of user you are.Use case #1 WordPress newbiesPeople who are joining WordPress for the first time dont have a real concern for historical facts and what was here before they arrived.If it works (and it does) why bother to look for options? For people building their first sites, the block editor is the only reality. These new adopters are not challenged by previous habits and they will start using it right off the bat.If you have a new site and youve just joined WordPress, just roll with it and make sure youre updating to the new versions when they come out. The 5.1 release is coming out  on February 21st and brings new site health features and a faster running editor.Use case #2 Long-time WordPressersThis is where we also belong. Here are people that have at least a live site on WordPress. They built their sites when the classic TinyMCE editor was around and needed to learn all the wid gets and plugins that came to help.If your sites were published before WordPress 5.0, its better to wait a couple of months until all theme and plugin developers have made the transition to the new editor. You can still update WordPress, but use the old editor instead (heres how to keep using the Classic TinyMCE editor for now).The next steps for usOver the next few months, were putting more effort into the development of themes, with Neve coming along with a starter sites library built with the new block editor.Beyond that, were going to keep enhancing our Otter blocks plugin to help users get more from the block editor. WordPress UI keep evolving. This was a needed challenge to bring more usability to the users and it feels like things are moving in the right direction. In order for us to evolve, we need to change our old ways and rediscover how to be creative, which is best brought by the unknown.Free guide5 Essential Tips to Speed Up Your WordPress SiteReduce your loading time b y even 50-80% just by following simple tips.

Free Writing Sample Essay - American Citizens Must Speak Out

Free Writing Sample Essay - American Citizens Must Speak OutIf you have an illegal immigrant family member or are planning on opening up a restaurant, you should consider writing a sample essay that they can use for an amnesty application. As an American citizen you have the right to participate in the national discussion about illegal immigration. And, if you are able to, you should write an essay on behalf of the United States of America.People all over the world are against amnesty. Why? Because it will take away the culture and heritage that is embedded in this country.Why do you think the illegals come here? The answer is simple. It is cheap labor, the cheapest in the world. It is not an easy job, but with today's technology anyone with the skills can do it.There are illegal ways to find out the best legal ways to bring in this type of workforce. Many illegal migrants have contacted me to say that they are glad I wrote their samples for amnesty applications.The illegal aliens ha ve their own way of looking at things, they live in their own little world. That is what makes America so great. But it has come at a cost and the debate will continue until it is resolved.If you have the right perspective, the top level cabinet positions may open up. You may have a higher salary, have access to more benefits, you may be able to live in gated communities and you may have to comply with federal laws. But, only if you have the right attitude.Do not let an illegal immigrant win. Write your own sample essay and make sure it is both honest and authentic. Only then will we truly see how your perspective and arguments will contribute to an amnesty.

The 11 Best Pre-Med Schools to Help You Become a Doctor

The 11 Best Pre-Med Schools to Help You Become a Doctor SAT / ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips Choosing an undergraduate school is the first major step any student will make on the path to becoming a physician. If you’re an aspiring pre-med, you'll want to give yourself the best opportunities and support networks in college and beyond. Applying to (and succeeding in) medical school is a grueling process, so you’ll need to be prepared. Here, I’ll talk about what actually makes a school good for pre-meds before getting into the good stuff: the list of best pre-med schools. What Makes a School Good for Pre-Meds? 6 Key Factors Pre-med students need a lot of specialized resources and opportunities as undergraduates in order to boost their med school applications. It’s important that aspiring physicians attend schools that aren’t only highly ranked but that also provide unique support to pre-meds. In creating this list of best pre-med schools, I considered the following six factors (as you should, too, when deciding on a school!). Factor 1: Medical Schools Admissions History This is perhaps the most obvious and most important factor to consider before applying to college. Various specialized resources for pre-meds are great, but what really matters (and what keys you in to whether these resources are effective or not) is the percentage of pre-med students from that college who actually end up in medical school. The problem is that not all undergraduate institutions make this information easily available, and if they do, the numbers might be artificially inflated. For instance, they might not count students who start off as pre-med but don’t fulfill all the requirements. Or they might attempt to "weed out" weaker students from the pre-med track with difficult classes. That being said, here are some steps you can take to get a general sense of a school’s med school admissions history: Start with online research to see whether any stats are available for the colleges you’re interested in. Try searching "[School Name] pre-med admissions" on Google. Look into class profiles of med schools you’re interested in. For example, Tulane's School of Medicine's latest class profile lists the major colleges and universities its students come from; these include Tulane, UCLA, Emory, UVA, and LSU. This isn't the norm, however, as many med school class profiles don't contain information about undergraduate institutions. Whenever available, I included med school admissions stats in the descriptions below. If I could find stats only from unreliable sources, I did not include them on the list. Factor 2: Pre-Med Advising There are a lot of requirements and activities to keep track of when preparing for medical school applications- something you’ll be thinking about starting as a freshman in college (or perhaps even earlier). Special pre-med advising programs are really helpful when it comes to making sure you’re on the right track. Knowledgeable pre-med advisors and mentors should be able to prepare you for all aspects of the application process, including course and major selection, application development, and interview preparation. The more intensive the advising resources, the better prepared you’ll be for your med school applications. Factor 3: Research and Publication Opportunities You’ll need research experience in some sort of STEM lab for med school applications. The earlier you start your research and the more research you do, the more impressive you’ll look to medical schools. Well-funded research institutions will often have many opportunities for undergrads to get involved in labs simply because more research is happening. And more research means more opportunities for you to get your name on a paper or two, which is a big plus for your CV. You’ll notice that most of the schools on this list are very highly ranked research powerhouses with excellent medical schools- this is no coincidence. The same research funding, facilities, and faculty that make a med school great also help make a school great for pre-meds. Factor 4: Clinical Experience Opportunities You don’t just need research experience for your med school apps- you also need work in clinical settings. Oftentimes, you’ll have to get this experience through volunteer work, such as at a clinic or nursing home. If you’re in an area with limited clinical environments, it’ll be tough to get the experience you need, especially if you have to compete with other pre-meds. Med schools want to see that you’ve spent time in the field- make sure your school of choice offers opportunities for you to gain this experience. Factor 5: Rigor of Curriculum You might not be excited at the prospect of seeking out tough courses on purpose, but a rigorous curriculum will ensure you’re prepared for both the MCAT and medical school. Schools that are tough on their premeds will ultimately produce stronger med school applicants, which is a good thing considering that less than half of all pre-med applicants end up in medical school! Factor 6: Pre-Med Major vs Pre-Med School Most colleges and universities don’t actually have a dedicated pre-med major. At these schools, students are responsible for meeting their general education requirements, their major requirements, and their pre-med requirements. As you might expect, many of the best schools for pre-meds don’t have a specific pre-med major. That being said, they do have strong biological and physical sciences departments. (In fact, many students choose these majors because there’s a lot of overlap with pre-med requirements.) The Best Pre-Med Schools, Ranked College rankings are helpful when starting your college search, but no ranking list is perfect since there’s no way to come up with an officially objective system that applies to all students. In an effort to be as transparent as possible, I’ve compiled this list of the best pre-med schools using the factors described above. Keep in mind that these schools are all stellar options, and the ranking numbers themselves aren’t particularly important. What matters more is how these schools might or might not fit your college criteria. Now, let's take a look at the best med schools! #1: Harvard Harvard’s Office of Career Services estimates that 17% of any one of its classes will apply to med school- that's a huge fraction of the student body! Pre-med applicants with a 3.5 GPA or higher had a 93% acceptance rate to med schools in 2013, whereas average acceptance rates that year were about 42%. Harvard College offers a peer pre-med advising program in which students are assigned a pre-med tutor sophomore through senior year. Harvard University houses the #1 ranked medical school in the US and also boasts extremely strong biological sciences departments. There are several affiliated teaching hospitals nearby, too (which are great for both research and clinical experience). #2: Johns Hopkins Johns Hopkins is well reputed as a very highly ranked med school and medical research institution, which means you'll have numerous research and clinical opportunities. You’re sure to have access to impressive resources, as the university is affiliated with one of the best teaching hospitals in the country. Undergraduates at Johns Hopkins follow a pre-med advising program track (which isn't a major). This advising track includes individual appointments, small group meetings, and special programs. The school also has many health-related student organizations. Unfortunately, there’s no good information out there on med school acceptance rates for pre-meds at Johns Hopkins. #3: Stanford Stanford isn’t just a top-ranked college- it also houses a top-ranked medical school. Special pre-med advisors are available to discuss ideas, plan your coursework, help you visualize your long-term objectives, and give you options for gaining experience in the field. The pre-med community at Stanford seems especially organized and cohesive. The Stanford Pre-Medical Association offers lots of information and resources to students, all in one place. #4: University of Pennsylvania Penn’s Perelman School of Medicine is one of the best in the US; access to this med school means tons of research opportunities. But don’t just take my word for it! In 2017, 78% of Penn students who applied to med school were accepted- that's well above the national average of 43% that year. The school also offers a pre-health advising program to guide students through fulfilling pre-med requirements and successfully applying to medical school. #5: Columbia Columbia is home to a top-15 med school. Here, students are assigned a pre-med advisor and attend informational meetings sponsored by the Premedical Committee. Columbia's convenient NYC location guarantees easy access to countless clinics and hospitals, giving you plenty of opportunities for clinical and research experience. Want to build the best possible college application for BS/MD programs? We can help. PrepScholar Admissions is the world's best admissions consulting service. We combine world-class admissions counselors with our data-driven, proprietary admissions strategies. We've overseen thousands of students get into their top choice schools, from state colleges to the Ivy League. We know what kinds of students colleges want to admit. We want to get you admitted to your dream schools. Learn more about PrepScholar Admissions to maximize your chance of getting in. #6: Duke We've luckily found some information about med school acceptance rates for Duke undergrads- according to Duke, 85% of its college students get into med school, which is more than twice the national average. This likely has partly to do with the fact that Duke hosts a top-10 medical school. In addition, pre-med students are assigned an advisor who mentors them through the college and med school application processes. #7: University of Washington You might have noticed that all the schools on the list so far have been private schools. But not the University of Washington! UW is one of the best public med schools in terms of research and primary care, and pre-med students benefit significantly from these resources. Pre-health career coaches and advisors help students with academic and vocational concerns, such as picking classes, job shadowing, research, volunteering, etc., through a combination of individual and group meetings. There are also many pre-med student groups, including Alpha Epsilon Delta and the Student Health Consortium. #8: UNC Chapel Hill Unfortunately, UNC doesn’t track specifics when it comes to med school acceptance rates for pre-meds. One source states that 90% of UNC pre-med students who apply to med school get in, but take this with a grain of salt. Overall, UNC has a very good reputation across many health fields for both undergraduate and graduate students. UNC offers an interesting nine-week Medical Education Development (MED) summer program, an intensive program for smart and committed students who have lacked past opportunities to move toward a career in the medical field. If you’re not ready to attend college as a pre-med but want to become a physician, this could be a good option for you. #9: Cornell An impressive 76% of Cornell pre-meds with a GPA of 3.4 or higher got into medical school in 2016. If you end up as a pre-med at Cornell, you’ll be in good company: about 1/6 of undergrads there are interested in pursuing a career in medicine. The school is pretty isolated, so the best research and clinical experiences are the ones on campus. Cornell has a decently ranked med school, which likely provides many of these opportunities. Finally, the school’s Health Careers Program provides specialized advising, programs, information, and an Evaluation Committee to pre-med students. This Committee is particularly helpful when it comes to getting letters of recommendation for medical school applications. Outdoorsy students might not mind trading an urban environment for the scenery in Ithaca, NY. #10: Northwestern With a top-20 med school, Northwestern offers lots of research and clinical opportunities. It helps that the school is located in a bustling urban area. Unfortunately, there’s no available info on pre-med acceptance rates to medical schools for students at Northwestern. There is, however, a lot of info on available resources on the school’s pre-med advising website. These advisors help students with everything from choosing courses to applying to med school. Pre-meds are welcome to schedule individual meetings or stop by during drop-in hours. Bonus: Georgetown I’m including Georgetown on this list because it offers a pretty interesting option for students who like to plan ahead called the Early Assurance Program. If you’re a high-achieving pre-med student at Georgetown, you can get assurance of admission at Georgetown School of Medicine at the end of your senior year. Georgetown isn’t ranked as highly as the other schools above are, but if you’re not interested in going into academia, this won’t matter too much. 3 Final Tips for Future Pre-Med Students If you’re thinking about choosing a pre-med track (or even if you’re still just thinking about it!), you can set yourself up for success by following these three tips. For more guidance, check out our step-by-step guide on how to become a doctor and our list of the best books for pre-med students. Tip 1: Focus on Math and Science in High School You’ll need a foundation in high school for your pre-med courses in college, and you’ll need to do well in those college courses in order to get into med school- it’s that simple! It might be painful at times, but doing well in math and science classes will set you up for better admissions chances at one of these top pre-med programs. Tip 2: Look Beyond Schools' Pre-Med Programs There are so many other factors to consider when making a decision about where to go to college. A school’s pre-med program is important of course, but so are the more practical features that will affect your quality of life. Are you happy with the general area in which the school is located? What about the school's room and board options? Are there student groups or activities you’re excited about? If you’re not happy at school on a day-to-day basis, this could negatively affect your performance when trying to fulfill your pre-med requirements. Tip 3: Keep Your GPA High Many of the stats I found on pre-med acceptance rates to med schools qualified those stats by providing information based on students' GPAs. The implicit (or sometimes explicit) implication here is that students with higher GPAs have more success getting into med school. While of course an undergraduate institution with research opportunities and great advising will help your chances, those resources can only do so much if your grades aren’t great. Conversely, you can still get into med school with great grades and an awesome MCAT score even if you didn’t go to a super prestigious undergraduate institution. What’s Next? If you’re still figuring out whether a career as a physician is right for you, consider getting some hands-on experience. You might not think there’s much you can do as a high school student, but there is! Start by shadowing a physician, and then check out our guide to the best med programs for students in high school. If you’re interested in pre-med programs, you might also be interested in BS/MD programs. Take a look at our comprehensive guide on how to get into a great BS/MD program to streamline the med school application process. Want to know what you should be doing right now to prepare for pre-med programs? Read our complete guide on how to prepare for pre-med in high school and our list of the seven books every pre-med student should read. Want to improve your SAT score by 160 points or your ACT score by 4 points? We've written a guide for each test about the top 5 strategies you must be using to have a shot at improving your score. Download it for free now:

Scorecard Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3500 words

Scorecard - Essay Example Promising results have been reported in the for-profit and governmental organizations already supporting the use of the balanced scorecard and its applicability. Keywords: Balanced Scorecard (BSC), Ministry of Education (MOE), National Center for Education Development (NCED), The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TMISS), and Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) Applying a Balanced Scorecard to the Kuwaiti Government Education System: An Initial Approach for Reforming Education Introduction In the past few decades, there have been numerous calls and demands for reforming the educational system in Kuwait. Many decision makers in the education were under the belief that if they just tweak and implement new ideas in the system, then it would work. Unfortunately, the number of fragmented solutions toward reforming education did not help the situation in the least. The solutions and ideas presented were limitless and included such concepts as flash drives, new textbooks, special programs, new curriculum, bribing students to learn, more extensive examinations, and list goes on an on. Each new idea was initially supported and tossed around various academic circles, then quickly forgotten as a new and better idea for reform was presented, with more empty promises that this new strategy would really work this time around. The Kuwaiti educational system is sick, and the intention or pretense to improve is not enough. To achieve these lofty goals for reform, professionals in the field of education need to seriously regard what exactly needs improving, and then developing sound strategies about such improvement will be measured moving forward. The elements of reform within various levels of the educational system should be seen as a complete picture. This involves having a core target that must be focused and at the center of the system. Successful efforts at improving the education system should be measured by a clear set of goals t hat are linked to the needs of both parents and students (Stone & Dahir, 2006; Gysbers & Henderson, 2000). This drive for educational reform has focused attention on the measurement of student performance by various organizations existent in the system. This paper will focus, to a large degree, on the current discussion by researchers regarding the adaption of a new methodology aimed at reforming the education system in Kuwait. This is most commonly referred to as the Balanced Scorecard. This paper is further aimed to stimulate and provide an informative discussion about the reforms needed based on the conceptual framework of the balanced scorecard. It also outlines a vision for the future of education in the region and gives an overview of key challenges, and makes recommendations for future action. Literature Review Kuwaiti Educational System Kuwait has invested considerable amounts of its oil wealth into developing a comprehensive public education system. The system ranges from p reschool, starting at the age of four, to five years of primary, four years of intermediate level education, and three years of secondary schooling. The academic system in Kuwait is highly centralized. The Ministry of Education manages and regulates districts and their schools. It is also responsible for developing and providing curriculum, textbooks, and the hiring of teachers. The evaluation for student achievement in Kuwait, for

Investment Portfolio Implementation & Management Essay

Investment Portfolio Implementation & Management - Essay Example The following aspects have been considered before formulating the appropriate asset allocation strategy for the investor: An investment portfolio consists of a number of asset classes which have different levels of standard deviations, returns and yields. The assets that are to be included within an asset allocation model depend largely on the kind of return being expected by the investor and the risk that the individual is willing to bear (Market Watch, 2013). Therefore before preparing the asset allocation model, the first thing that needs to be identified over here is the latest investment benchmark figures of the different asset classes. Considering the above mentioned investment benchmarks, 8% of Dr. O’Hara’s investment should be made behind intermediate bonds as the investor wants to invest $30,000 in an asset that is considered safe and is associated with no expense, sales or early withdrawal charges. This will enable Dr. O’Hara that a guaranteed return is realized at the end of maturity thereby enabling the individual to pay for travel expenses without any inconvenience. Now, considering the fact that Dr. O’Hara wants to earmark $60,000 in an account with higher than current certificate of deposit or money market rates but minimal market volatility, 17% of the total investment sum should be invested in short term bonds. They have a standard deviation value of 0.68% indicates that this asset is less volatile. Therefore, keeping $60,000 earmarked for an investment in short term bonds will enable the investor to enjoy a return close to 0.71%, 1.23% and 2.74% respectively in bonds with 1 year, 5 years and 10 years maturity. The remaining 75% of the investment fund should be distributed appropriately between large cap stocks, small cap stocks, mid cap stocks and international stocks. 27% of the investment fund should be invested